Share |

Wednesday, 28 November 2012

Wibsey Pensioner falls victim to Vandals

The news, unfortunately, tends to be full of depressing stories, and one that was drawn to my attention earlier this evening was about as depressing as a local news story can get, involving as it did the death of an 84-year-old Wibsey woman named Joyce Moulson following an attack upon her home by vandals last night. The latter threw stones at her front door, breaking one of its glass panes. The stress engendered by this cruel behaviour caused Mrs Moulson to collapse some ten minutes after the incident, and she later died in Bradford Royal Infirmary.

The police stated that they were searching for “three male youths” in connection with the incident on Fair Road, but rather oddly, the descriptions of the suspects provided in the Halifax Courier made reference to one of them as being “white, around 13 years old, of large build with dark, shoulder length curly hair” whilst omitting to mention the racial background of the other two who were simply described as “of similar age and of slimmer build.” Why was this? Were the other two clad from head to toe in all-enveloping clothing that hid any trace of their skin from onlookers? As for the Telegraph and Argus, it didn’t mention any racial characteristics whatsoever, as was the case with the later BBC report which revealed that the West Yorkshire Police had arrested “four boys, two aged 12 and two aged 13,[who] . . . were being questioned on suspicion of manslaughter.”

When police are searching for suspects, surely racial background is held to be a useful identifying characteristic as suggested by the report’s reference to a “white” boy, so why was only the “white” individual singled out? Were the others white, or not? The manner in which the report was written suggests not, so what were they, and why was this information withheld if it was known? To make reference to the racial background of one of the suspects and not to that of the others is peculiar, not to mention a potential hindrance to aiding in their identification.


  1. About four years ago in the NE of England, we had an outstanding case of this deliberate neglect of duty. After a Christmas night out, a girl was brutally raped in the east end of Newcastle. The police issued an appeal for witnesses without giving a description of the attacker. A week later they issued another appeal identical to the first. Another week later an appeal for witnesses was issued but this time with a description of the rapist....'very dark-skinned'. later in the week, an e-fit was presented to the public. I won't go into the size or shape of his nose and lips or indeed the texture of his hair but they were right about him being 'very dark-skinned'.
    As far as I'm aware, he was never caught and is now probably living it up in the European country of his choice thanks to our polce service and the NUJ.

    1. That represents a terrible neglect of the police’s responsibility to the public. Descriptions of suspects are useless if they omit to tell you what they actually look like.

  2. Given that it's Bradford, wait for hand-ringing about the behaviour of "Asians" to start.


Comments that call for or threaten violence will not be published. Anyone is entitled to criticise the arguments presented here, or to highlight what they believe to be factual error(s); ad hominem attacks do not constitute comment or debate. Although at times others' points of view may be exasperating, please attempt to be civil in your responses. If you wish to communicate with me confidentially, please preface your comment with "Not for publication". This is why all comments are moderated.