AddThis

Share |

Thursday 8 December 2011

Justice for Rhea Page: EDL National Demo

The Casuals United blog has announced that there will be an EDL protest against the scandalously lenient non-custodial sentence handed out to the four Somalian women who carried out a vicious unprovoked race attack against Rhea Page. On Saturday 21 January 2012, the EDL will be holding a national demo, but the location is yet to be announced; given the scene of the incident, it may well be in Leicester. Let’s hope that there is an excellent turnout for the protest, and that the judiciary is compelled to re-examine this case. The English public must make clear that it is no longer willing to put up with the institutional anti-white racism promoted by ‘diversity’ and ‘equality’ legislation. This legislation must be repealed! 

Staggeringly, as of 07:45 on the morning of Thursday 8 December, the BBC News website still has not covered the Rhea Page story. Its editiorial staff cannot but fail to be aware of what has happened, and must therefore have made the deliberate decision not to cover this miscarriage of justice. Why will it not cover this story? The BBC is our main public service broadcaster, and it is in the public interest that this case should be brought to the attention of its viewers, listeners and readers. It should be the BBC's duty to highlight such a blatant miscarriage of justice and example of  anti-white institutional racism. Evidently, it has chosen not to do so as this does not fit into its warped narrative that insists that only white people, particularly English ones, can be guilty of 'racism'; that we are a particularly nasty subset of humanity, and that our country is 'institutionally racist' against blacks and Muslims [sic]. After all, the BBC doesn't want to deflect public attention from whom it thinks should be a scapegoat for the ills of our increasingly ethnically fragmented and tense country: Emma West.  




11 comments:

  1. I'm told by EDL forum admin that it will be Leicester, that they are expecting a march ban, but will go ahead with a static demo anyway.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for the info Quiet Man. A static demo will make the point well enough.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Your involvement inspired my post today, with the necessary hat tips, D.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I may be wrong, but isn't the EDL renowned for its far right racist views? Although I do agree that these girls should have received a proper sentence I don't think a demo from the EDL will be the best way to get a retrial considering their reputation.

    ReplyDelete
  5. @ anonymous.
    The EDL are neither far right nor racist, your information is wrong and appears to have been gleaned from the MSM and various leftist sites.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I'm about to make a complaint about the omission of this case. There is considerable public interest given the weight given to the plea in mitigation. It raises issues of whether people from different religions and ethnicities are equal under the law.

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/complaints/forms/?id=VL3IO7C594RLJJAC748JJNRU6K&uid=285516714

    ReplyDelete
  7. Please please please dont get violent during the protest, we need to show that we are civilised, not thugs. the sentance was too leniant regardless of the criminals colour. I hope you would feel the same if it was a black girl who was attacked by 4 white girls, the sentance was way too leniant, and there should have been a racial conviction given the language those girls used during the attack. I really want justice for Rhea

    ReplyDelete
  8. Attack on Rhea Page

    It is unusual for the Federation of Muslim Organisations (FMO) to comment on individual judgements made by our courts system. However, if the story carried by sections of the media is fully and accurately reported, the FMO is deeply concerned about the way in which the perpetrators have linked their actions to a lax moment in their understanding of their faith. The FMO deplores in the strongest terms, the case of four Somali girls attacking support worker Rhea Page in which they were found guilty and handed suspended sentences.

    Federation PR Officer Suleman Nagdi, said, “We condemn violence of any kind, especially mindless acts such as this, when a gang set upon a defenceless victim who herself works to support some of the most vulnerable and disadvantaged people in society. Alcohol is strictly prohibited in Islam and so the alcohol fuelled behaviour of these girls is a total contradiction to the teachings of Islam. The behaviour exhibited by the guilty parties has no relation to the behaviour of the general Muslim or Somali community who have worked hard and continue to do so to integrate into British society to make an invaluable contribution to the success of our nation. Drunken, yobbish and violent behaviour has no place in our society and our thoughts go out to Rhea Page who we hope makes a quick recovery so that she can continue the excellent work she is doing for the good of humanity. I echo her sentiments about the final judgement passed on the case. I would also like to acknowledge the role of the police in this case".

    ReplyDelete
  9. The EDL are the only people doing anything about this grave miscarriage of
    justice which has prompted my interest in your organisation. I am 69 years of age and dont think I could make the journey to Leicester but I would love to be there to show my support

    ReplyDelete
  10. i have just seen on face about rhea and must admit that i knew nothing about this attack as you say where was the headlines? i undersatnd what you say about no violence whilst demonstrating and totally agree with you. but! i have to disagree with your comment that we should feel the same way if 4 white girls attacked someone of ethnic origin as we wouldnt be having this discussion as the 4 white girls would now be serving prison sentences up to 15 years each,

    ReplyDelete
  11. The c.p.s. can appeal against a sentence that is to low.and that was a joke.and the courts and BBC is run by jews , if that was a jew that got beat it would be"anti semetic" and front page

    ReplyDelete

Comments that call for or threaten violence will not be published. Anyone is entitled to criticise the arguments presented here, or to highlight what they believe to be factual error(s); ad hominem attacks do not constitute comment or debate. Although at times others' points of view may be exasperating, please attempt to be civil in your responses. If you wish to communicate with me confidentially, please preface your comment with "Not for publication". This is why all comments are moderated.